Table of Contents >> Show >> Hide
- 1) First, diagnose the real problem (it’s rarely “laziness”)
- 2) Set the non-negotiables (without becoming the Sales Police)
- 3) Fix the “outbound experience” so it doesn’t feel like misery
- 4) Make in-person visits worth it (and not just “airport cosplay”)
- 5) Change the comp plan (carefully) so outbound and visits are rewarded
- 6) Coach like you mean it (not “Have you tried working harder?”)
- 7) Decide if you need to “start over” (partially or fully)
- 8) A practical 30-day turnaround plan (no heroics required)
- Conclusion: You can’t “motivate” what you don’t define
- Experiences: What this looks like in the real world (and how it usually turns around)
- Experience #1: The team that was “too senior” for outbound
- Experience #2: The outbound motion that failed because the list was trash
- Experience #3: The “customer visits are pointless” myth
- Experience #4: The comp plan that accidentally rewarded comfort
- Experience #5: The manager who turned it around with coaching, not pressure
Dear SaaStr,
My sales team doesn’t want to do outbound. They don’t want to visit customers in person. They mostly want warm leads, Zoom calls, and a reasonable day. I need more pipeline and better retention. How do I get them to work harder?
Dear Founder/CRO/Accidental Therapist,
You’re asking a question that sounds like it’s about effort (“work harder”), but it’s usually about expectations, economics, and environment. If you fix those three, you’ll be surprised how quickly “harder” turns into “happier, busier, and closing more.” If you don’t fix them… you’ll keep hosting the world’s least fun weekly meeting: the one where you beg adults to do the job they were hired to do.
Let’s break this down into what’s actually happening, what you can change fast, and when the honest answer is: you need to start over (at least in part).
1) First, diagnose the real problem (it’s rarely “laziness”)
When a SaaS sales team avoids outbound and customer visits, one of these is almost always true:
A. The comp plan pays them to avoid it
If reps can hit quota on inbound, renewals, or easy expansions, they’ll protect that path like it’s the last slice of pizza. This isn’t a character flawit’s rational behavior. You asked for “more outbound,” but your incentives quietly asked for “maximum comfort per dollar earned.”
B. They don’t believe outbound will work
Outbound feels terrible when the targeting is sloppy, the messaging is generic, and the list looks like it was created by shaking a phone book and hoping for the best. If your ICP is fuzzy, outbound becomes a rejection simulator with a commission plan.
C. They don’t feel safe failing
Outbound is an “at-bats” game. If reps fear punishment for low reply rates or awkward calls, they’ll avoid the activity that produces visible failure. It’s human nature: we dodge the scoreboard when we think we’ll lose.
D. Your culture drifted into “inbound order-taking”
This happens quietly. You hire AEs who close what shows up, you celebrate “speed-to-lead,” and nobody is rewarded for grinding through a cold territory. Six months later, you have a team that thinks outbound is “what SDRs did at my last company.”
E. Customer visits are logistically painful (and nobody taught them how to run them)
In-person meetings aren’t just “show up.” Reps need a reason to travel, a tight agenda, a desired outcome, and a plan to turn that visit into pipeline, expansion, or renewal risk reduction. If they don’t have that, travel becomes expensive wandering.
Quick gut-check: If you changed nothing except the comp plan and expectations, would behavior change? If yes, it’s not motivationit’s math.
2) Set the non-negotiables (without becoming the Sales Police)
You can’t “hope” a team into outbound. You need clear standards that define the job. Not in a scary waymore like, “This is what great looks like here.”
Create a simple Sales Activity Scorecard
Keep it lightweight and consistent. For example:
- Outbound inputs: targeted accounts added, touches per day, new conversations started, meetings set
- Pipeline outputs: outbound-sourced pipeline created, stage conversion, pipeline coverage
- Customer impact: renewal risk reviews completed, executive sponsor meetings, expansion plays launched
Two rules make scorecards work:
- Inspect what you expect. If you never look at it, it’s a spreadsheet graveyard.
- Coach the inputs; manage the outputs. Inputs get coached weekly; outputs are what performance is measured on over time.
Important: Don’t set “dial 200 people a day” if your ICP requires thoughtful personalization. You want a repeatable system, not an outbound theater production where everyone pretends and you clap anyway.
3) Fix the “outbound experience” so it doesn’t feel like misery
Outbound fails most often because teams do it with the precision of a lawn sprinkler. The fix is not “more effort.” The fix is better targeting + better sequencing + better talk tracks.
A. Tighten your ICP and build a Tiered Account List
Create three tiers:
- Tier 1: high-fit, high-value accounts (deep research, multi-threading, custom POV)
- Tier 2: solid-fit accounts (repeatable messaging, light personalization)
- Tier 3: experiments (new verticals, new titles, new segments)
If you skip this step, reps will cherry-pick “easy-ish” accounts and call it outbound. (That’s not outbound. That’s “inbound, but with extra steps.”)
B. Build a real cadence (and stop freelancing)
A good outbound cadence mixes channels and timing: email, phone, LinkedIn, light content, and a reason to respond. Standardize 2–3 cadences by segment, then let reps personalize within the framework. The goal is consistency without sounding like a robot wearing a blazer.
C. Give them something smarter than “Just checking in”
Reps avoid outbound when the message feels weak. Replace fluff with:
- Trigger-based outreach: funding, hiring, new leadership, product launches, tech-stack changes
- Problem-based POV: “Here’s what companies in your space are doing about X, and where it usually breaks.”
- Micro-offers: a benchmark, checklist, teardown, or short assessment (not a 45-minute demo ambush)
When outbound is relevant and confident, it stops feeling like spam. And when it stops feeling like spam, reps stop dodging it.
4) Make in-person visits worth it (and not just “airport cosplay”)
Here’s the truth: many buyers want a hybrid experiencesome digital, some human, some self-serve. In-person can still be a competitive weapon when used intentionally.
Use customer visits for specific “high-leverage” moments
Ask reps to visit when there’s a strong reason:
- Renewal risk: executive alignment, adoption reset, success plan negotiation
- Expansion: multi-stakeholder workshop, roadmap mapping, cross-department rollout
- Enterprise deals: final mile, procurement alignment, champion enablement
- Strategic accounts: quarterly business reviews (QBRs), exec sponsor meetings
Give them a “Customer Visit Kit”
A rep should never arrive with “So… what’s new?” Provide a template:
- Pre-brief: goals, stakeholders, current product usage, open risks
- Agenda: 45–90 minutes, tight flow, decision points
- Outcome: next step scheduled before leaving the building
- Follow-up: recap email within 24 hours, with owners and deadlines
If you want more in-person visits, make them easier to win with. Otherwise, your reps will do what everyone does when something is unclear: procrastinate and blame “market conditions.”
5) Change the comp plan (carefully) so outbound and visits are rewarded
This is where many leaders overcorrect. They add a dozen SPIFFs, contests, and “points” systems until the comp plan looks like a casino loyalty program.
Keep it clean. You want three things:
- Pay for outcomes: revenue and qualified pipeline
- Reward leading indicators: meetings and opportunities (especially for newer territories)
- Protect quality: no garbage meetings that waste the whole org’s time
Simple, practical ideas
- Outbound-sourced accelerator: higher commission rate on outbound-sourced closed-won
- Meeting-to-opportunity kicker: a small bonus only when a meeting converts into a qualified opp
- Strategic account plan requirement: Tier 1 accounts must have an outbound plan + exec mapping
- Customer visit multiplier (for the right accounts): tie to renewal saves or expansion commits
And yessometimes you also need the stick: if the job requires outbound and visits, refusing to do them is refusing to do the job.
6) Coach like you mean it (not “Have you tried working harder?”)
Outbound skill is trained, not wished into existence. If your team avoids it, they likely lack confidence, language, or repetition.
Run weekly outbound enablement (30 minutes)
- 10 minutes: review what’s working (best email, best opener, best objection response)
- 10 minutes: role-play one scenario (yes, everyone groans; then they get better)
- 10 minutes: commit to next week’s focus (“multi-threading,” “problem framing,” etc.)
Use call coaching and “deal-less coaching”
Don’t only coach active deals. Coach prospecting calls and early discovery. That’s where behavior changes. If you only coach deals, reps will treat outbound as the annoying part you ignore until the “real work” begins.
7) Decide if you need to “start over” (partially or fully)
Here’s the uncomfortable part that SaaS leaders learn the hard way: many reps won’t fundamentally change their operating system. If they were hired and trained in a world of inbound, they may never become consistent outbound huntersno matter how many inspirational Slack messages you send.
So what do you do?
- Keep your closers who are strong on inbound/expansionbut define that role clearly.
- Add or replace with true outbound talent (AEs or SDRs) who like the hunt.
- Reset expectations at hiring: “Outbound is part of the job here. Customer visits are part of the job here.”
Sometimes the answer isn’t “get them to work harder.” It’s “build the team you actually need.”
8) A practical 30-day turnaround plan (no heroics required)
Week 1: Clarity
- Define ICP + Tier 1/2/3 account lists
- Pick 2 outbound motions (e.g., new logo + expansion into adjacent team)
- Publish the scorecard (inputs + outputs)
Week 2: Consistency
- Launch 2 standardized cadences
- Run first outbound role-play session
- Managers do 1:1 coaching on outbound calls/emails
Week 3: Leverage
- Identify 5–10 “must-visit” accounts (renewal risk or high expansion potential)
- Schedule clustered customer days (2–3 visits per trip)
- Start multi-threading: map 3–5 stakeholders per Tier 1 account
Week 4: Accountability
- Review outbound-sourced pipeline created
- Adjust messaging based on responses (not opinions)
- Decide: coach vs. PIP vs. role change vs. replacement
If you do this well, you’ll see early traction fastmore conversations, more meetings, more “we didn’t know you could help with that” moments. And those moments are the beginning of real pipeline.
Conclusion: You can’t “motivate” what you don’t define
If your sales team won’t do outbound or customer visits, don’t start with lectures. Start with the basics:
- Define the job (standards + scorecards)
- Make outbound workable (ICP + cadences + messaging)
- Make visits valuable (clear reasons, tight agendas, strong follow-up)
- Align incentives (pay for the behavior you need and the outcomes you want)
- Coach relentlessly (skills create confidence; confidence creates action)
- Start over where needed (right people, right expectations, Day 1)
And if you’re still stuck? Don’t ask, “How do I get them to work harder?” Ask, “Have I built a system where the right work is the easiest work to choose?” Fix thatand you’ll stop chasing effort and start scaling performance.
Experiences: What this looks like in the real world (and how it usually turns around)
Below are a few common “been there” scenarios leaders run into when a SaaS sales team avoids outbound and in-person customer time. These aren’t fairy tales where everyone hugs and outbound magically happens. They’re the messy, practical patterns that show up again and againalong with what actually moves the needle.
Experience #1: The team that was “too senior” for outbound
A founder once described their AEs as “enterprise closers,” which sounded impressive until you realized the pipeline was mostly demo requests and partner leads. The moment inbound slowed, the team’s calendar looked like a ghost town. When asked to prospect, the AEs had a collective allergic reaction: “That’s SDR work.”
The fix wasn’t arguing about job titles. The fix was role clarity. The company split the function: true hunters handled outbound (supported by SDRs), and the “closers” owned late-stage enterprise deals and expansions. Suddenly nobody felt like they were “below” the workbecause the work matched the role. Outbound improved because the people doing it were hired for it, coached for it, and measured on it.
Experience #2: The outbound motion that failed because the list was trash
Another team swore outbound “didn’t work” because they tried it for two months and got nothing. When we looked closer, the target list included companies that were wildly outside their ICP. Think: selling a workflow platform built for 200–2,000 employee companies… to 12-person startups. Reps weren’t avoiding outbound because they were lazythey were avoiding a process that made them feel incompetent.
Once the ICP was tightened and the list was tiered, outbound stopped being a rejection marathon. Meetings started appearing when the message was relevant and the pain was real. The reps didn’t “work harder.” They worked on the right people, with a better story.
Experience #3: The “customer visits are pointless” myth
Customer visits often get labeled “nice to have” until churn hits or an expansion stalls. One CRO I’ve seen handle this well created “Customer Days” in key regions: two AEs, one CSM, and a clear agenda per account. They scheduled QBRs, adoption resets, and expansion workshops in clusters so travel wasn’t a weekly punishment. The outcomes were measurable: fewer surprise renewals, faster expansion cycles, and better executive alignment.
The biggest change was psychological: reps stopped seeing travel as random and started seeing it as a lever. When they could connect an in-person visit to a renewal save or a major expansion, they didn’t need to be begged.
Experience #4: The comp plan that accidentally rewarded comfort
This is a classic. A company had a generous quota, lots of inbound, and a comp plan that paid the same whether pipeline was inbound or outbound. Reps optimized for the easiest route to quota: work the warm leads, close a handful, call it a day. Management tried to “motivate” them with pep talks. It didn’t work.
Then the company introduced a simple outbound accelerator: outbound-sourced revenue paid meaningfully more. They also tracked outbound-sourced pipeline with pride instead of suspicion (“Is this opp real?”). Within a month, top reps started experimenting. Within a quarter, outbound was part of the culture because the math made senseand the team could see the scoreboard.
Experience #5: The manager who turned it around with coaching, not pressure
One of the fastest turnarounds I’ve seen came from a sales manager who treated outbound like a skill-building program, not a moral failing. Every week: one call breakdown, one email rewrite, one role-play. The manager joined calls, gave tight feedback, and celebrated small wins (a reply, a referral, a second meeting) the way most teams only celebrate closed-won.
The surprise was how many reps actually wanted to be good at outboundthey just didn’t want to be bad at it in public. Coaching gave them a path to competence. Competence turned into confidence. Confidence turned into consistent activity.
The takeaway from all of these: when outbound and customer visits don’t happen, it’s usually not because people are inherently unwilling. It’s because the system makes that work unclear, unrewarded, or emotionally expensive. Fix the systemand you’ll be amazed how quickly “I don’t want to” becomes “Okay, what’s the plan?”
