Table of Contents >> Show >> Hide
- Why the 2020 winners feel bigger than a photo contest
- The standout winning pictures everyone will remember
- Overall Winner: Roberto Marchegiani, Jurassic Park
- Birds: Andreas Geh, Brambling Togetherness
- Other Animals: Samantha Stephens, Nature’s Pitfall
- Plants and Fungi: Radomir Jakubowski, Dead Forest
- Underwater and Black & White: Miloš Prelević and Henley Spiers
- Man and Nature: Jo-Anne McArthur, Hope in a Burned Forest
- Animal Portraits, Landscapes, Youth, and the Portfolio award
- What the 2020 winners say about modern nature photography
- A longer viewing experience: what it feels like to sit with these winning pictures
- Final thoughts
Some photo contests are nice. Some are impressive. And then there are the ones that make you stop mid-scroll, forget your coffee, and whisper something deeply sophisticated like, “Well… wow.” The Nature Photographer of the Year 2020 awards landed firmly in that second-brain-freeze category. This year’s winning pictures don’t just show nature being beautiful. They show nature being eerie, elegant, chaotic, fragile, and occasionally so dramatic it feels like the planet hired a full-time art director.
The 2020 edition of the contest delivered the kind of award-winning nature photos that remind you why people willingly wake up at 4 a.m., sit in freezing mud, and spend hours waiting for one perfect frame. The winning gallery stretches from Kenya to Serbia, from underwater scenes to burnt forests, from intimate animal portraits to landscapes that look like they were designed by a fantasy novelist with excellent taste. And while the images are visually stunning, the real magic is that many of them also tell deeper stories about habitat, survival, behavior, and the uneasy relationship between humans and the natural world.
That is what makes this year’s results more than a pretty slideshow. These winning pictures feel like a snapshot of modern nature photography itself: technically sharp, emotionally intelligent, and deeply aware that a great image can do two jobs at once. It can make you stare. And it can make you care.
Why the 2020 winners feel bigger than a photo contest
The best wildlife photography competitions are never just about showing off camera gear or catching a rare animal on a lucky afternoon. They reward patience, timing, storytelling, and the photographer’s ability to turn a split second into something that feels permanent. That is exactly what the Nature Photographer of the Year 2020 winners do so well.
There is also a noticeable range in the gallery. Some images go big and cinematic. Others lean quiet and intimate. Some celebrate the sheer weirdness of the natural world, while others show the scars left by climate disasters and human expansion. Together, the results make the contest feel less like a trophy parade and more like a visual state-of-nature reportjust with much better lighting.
Another reason the 2020 edition stands out is that the images never feel repetitive. One minute you are looking at a giraffe framed like a dinosaur from another age. The next, you are staring into a foggy forest, a school of eagle rays, or a carnivorous plant with a plot twist that belongs in science fiction. The variety keeps the gallery fresh, but it also proves something important: there is no single formula for a great nature photo. Beauty helps, sure. But surprise is what seals the deal.
The standout winning pictures everyone will remember
Overall Winner: Roberto Marchegiani, Jurassic Park
If the title sounds dramatic, the image earns it. Roberto Marchegiani’s overall winning shot, Jurassic Park, captures a giraffe moving through a forested scene in Kenya with such perfect timing and atmosphere that it looks prehistoric. The genius of the frame is not just the subject; it is the restraint. Instead of chasing motion, Marchegiani waited for the animal to pass through exactly the right opening, turning a familiar safari subject into something mythic.
This is the kind of picture that explains, in one glance, why best nature photos 2020 lists were always going to have a hard time ignoring this contest. The photograph feels cinematic without looking overworked. It has mood, shape, mystery, and scale. Most of all, it proves that a winning image does not need chaos. Sometimes all it needs is one animal, one patch of light, and one very stubborn photographer who refuses to blink at the wrong moment.
Birds: Andreas Geh, Brambling Togetherness
Bird photography often gets reduced to the same old checklist: wings sharp, eye crisp, branch tasteful, sky politely blurred. Andreas Geh clearly did not get that memo. His winning bird image, Brambling Togetherness, turns a massive flock into something rhythmic and almost abstract. The stillness of perched birds collides with the blur of movement around them, creating a frame that feels alive rather than merely documented.
That is what makes it so memorable. It is not just a bird photo. It is a picture about coordination, motion, community, and the strange beauty of apparent chaos. In a year when many viewers were craving connection, the image landed with extra emotional weight. It is a reminder that a flock can look like noise until a photographer finds the hidden pattern inside it.
Other Animals: Samantha Stephens, Nature’s Pitfall
If there were an award for “photo most likely to make you lean toward your screen and say wait, what am I looking at?” this would be a strong contender. Samantha Stephens won the Other Animals category with Nature’s Pitfall, an image tied to a real ecological story involving Northern Pitcher Plants and juvenile Spotted Salamanders. It is the sort of frame that blends science, surprise, and visual tension in a way few photographs can.
What makes the image so effective is that it does not rely on spectacle alone. It works because it captures a fleeting natural interaction that many people would never know exists. That is the sweet spot of conservation photography: it expands the audience’s sense of what nature is actually doing when no one is watching.
Plants and Fungi: Radomir Jakubowski, Dead Forest
Radomir Jakubowski’s Dead Forest is proof that “plants and fungi” can be every bit as emotionally powerful as a charismatic animal portrait. The image shows fog wrapping through a damaged forest in Bavaria, with the dead trunks rising out of the haze like memories that refuse to leave. It is moody, elegant, and a little haunting.
But it is not just a doom-and-gloom postcard. Part of the strength of the image is that it hints at change over time. Forest death, recovery, disturbance, and renewal all seem to exist in the same frame. The result is a landscape that feels both wounded and alive, which is exactly why it stays with you.
Underwater and Black & White: Miloš Prelević and Henley Spiers
Miloš Prelević’s In The Hiding won the Underwater category, and it is a brilliant reminder that underwater nature photography is often about atmosphere as much as subject. Instead of a loud, hyper-saturated ocean cliché, the image gives us tension and stealth. The hidden predator blends into the scene just enough to make discovery part of the experience.
Henley Spiers’ Constellation of Eagle Rays, the Black & White winner, goes in a different direction but reaches the same destination: awe. By removing color, the image emphasizes pattern, spacing, and form, turning the rays into something celestial. It feels less like marine documentation and more like a night sky decided to go swimming.
Man and Nature: Jo-Anne McArthur, Hope in a Burned Forest
This may be the most emotionally direct image in the entire set. Jo-Anne McArthur’s winning entry in the Man and Nature category shows wildlife in the aftermath of Australia’s devastating fires. The picture is not subtle, and it should not be. Nature photography is sometimes accused of romanticizing the planet into one endless wallpaper calendar. This image refuses to play along.
Instead, it makes room for grief, resilience, and accountability. The title, Hope in a Burned Forest, is carefully chosen. There is damage in the frame, but there is also survival. That balance matters. The photo does not preach, yet it leaves no doubt that the modern nature photography contest is also a place where environmental truth can punch through the prettiness.
Animal Portraits, Landscapes, Youth, and the Portfolio award
Elsewhere in the winners list, Adriana Claudia Sanz’s I Can Pass? brings humor and personality to the Animal Portraits category, showing that intimacy is often more powerful than grandeur. Stanislao Basileo’s landscape winner, Il bosco incantato, leans into atmosphere and painterly mood, proving that landscape photography still has plenty of room for enchantment. Lili Sztrehárszki’s Youth-winning image, Tiny Details, is a lovely reminder that fresh eyes can produce serious work. And Alejandro Prieto’s Fred Hazelhoff portfolio, Border Wall Project, expands the conversation even further by tying animal movement and habitat disruption to a deeply human-made boundary.
That range is the point. The Nature Photographer of the Year 2020 results are not memorable because one image won. They are memorable because the whole gallery argues for a broader idea of what nature photography can be.
What the 2020 winners say about modern nature photography
If you look at these images together, a few themes emerge fast. First, viewers and judges are drawn to pictures that tell a story immediately. You do not need a paragraph of explanation to feel the tension in a burned forest, a hidden pike, or a strange encounter inside a pitcher plant. The strongest photos communicate before you even read the caption.
Second, originality matters more than ever. Nature is endlessly beautiful, but beauty alone is no longer enough to dominate a major contest. The images that rise to the top tend to show familiar subjects in unfamiliar ways: a giraffe like a dinosaur, rays like constellations, a flock like a living weather system. The best photographers are not just finding wildlife. They are finding fresh ways to see it.
Third, ethics and conservation have become impossible to separate from the conversation. The field has shifted. Great award-winning nature photos now carry more responsibility. They are expected not only to impress but also to respect the subject and, in many cases, reveal something about the pressures shaping life in the wild. The 2020 winning pictures reflect that shift beautifully.
And finally, the winners prove that emotional range is a strength. Some images are serene. Some are unsettling. Some are playful. Some hit like a documentary still from the planet’s roughest year. That tonal variety makes the collection feel honest. Nature is not one mood, and good photography should not pretend otherwise.
A longer viewing experience: what it feels like to sit with these winning pictures
Spending real time with the Nature Photographer of the Year 2020 gallery is a different experience from casually skimming through a social feed. On social media, images flash by like appetizers. Here, they behave more like full meals. You stop. You return. You notice details the second time that you completely missed the first time. The giraffe is not just a giraffe; it becomes shape, silhouette, timing, mood. The birds are not just birds; they become choreography. The burned forest is not just background; it becomes the emotional center of the frame.
That slow-burn effect is part of what makes these winning pictures so satisfying. They reward attention. The more closely you look, the more you realize how much discipline sits behind each image. You can almost feel the waiting in them. Waiting for light. Waiting for fog. Waiting for a flock to shift. Waiting for an animal to trust the scene enough to enter the frame. Nature photography, at its best, is a record of patience disguised as a miracle.
There is also something oddly comforting about seeing such a wide range of subjects handled with equal seriousness. The gallery does not act like only giant mammals deserve applause. A salamander, a forest, a school of rays, a hidden fish, and a young photographer’s careful eye all get room at the table. That broadens the emotional experience of the viewer. You are not just admiring “big wildlife moments.” You are being invited to care about ecosystems, textures, relationships, and even ecological oddities that rarely make headline status.
And then there is the emotional whiplash, which I mean as a compliment. One image fills you with wonder. The next hits you with loss. Another makes you grin because the animal seems to have wandered into the frame with suspiciously excellent comic timing. Another makes you uneasy because it points straight at the damage humans have done. That mix keeps the gallery honest. It never turns nature into a sanitized fantasy. Instead, it feels more like a conversation between beauty and consequence.
By the time you reach the end, the overall impression is not just that these photographers are talentedthough obviously, they are painfully, almost annoyingly talented. It is that nature itself remains inexhaustible as a subject. There is still so much mystery out there. So much pattern, drama, tenderness, and strangeness waiting to be seen well. The 2020 winners do not simply present a set of winning pictures. They remind viewers why photography still matters in an over-scrolled world. A truly great nature image can interrupt indifference. It can make a viewer care about a species, a place, a crisis, or even just a moment of light that would otherwise disappear forever.
That is the lingering experience of this collection. You leave impressed by the craft, but you also leave re-sensitized. Trees look more dramatic. Birds look more coordinated. Fog looks more theatrical. Even the ordinary backyard weed starts to feel like it might be hiding a prize-winning secret. And honestly, that may be the highest compliment you can pay any nature photography contest: after seeing the gallery, the world outside your window looks a little less ordinary and a lot more alive.
Final thoughts
The Nature Photographer of the Year 2020 winners succeeded because they did not settle for pretty. They went for meaningful, strange, moving, and unforgettable. Roberto Marchegiani’s Jurassic Park may have taken the overall crown, but the broader gallery is what really makes this edition special. It captures a full spectrum of what nature photography can do in 2020 and beyond: celebrate beauty, document fragility, elevate science, and turn one split-second encounter into a lasting emotional memory.
In other words, these are not just some of the best nature photos 2020 gave us. They are the kind of images that keep the bar ridiculously high for everyone else. Nature, as usual, did the heavy lifting. The photographers just had the skilland the nerveto meet it there.
